Is Gold Useless Part III

0 comments

With the recent collapse of Gold and its corresponding ETF, (GLD), I thought I would re-post some of what I have been saying for the last couple years, as the gold bubble grew bigger.  Since we never predicted an exact timeframe of when I thought the yellow metal crash will happen, most of the fundamental arguments, however correct, fell on deaf ears.  I admit that at this point I am not sure if the crash is finally here.  But unlike the past, I believe the answer to that question is only days if not hours away.

As some of you may know from the countless conversations and letters to investors I have been writing regarding the coming gold crash, I have also explained how the crash will look like when it finally takes place, and what’s the main reason for it being a crash rather than a “soft landing,” like many investors are probably hoping for right about now.

Why A Crash vs. Soft Landing?

As you will see from the chart below, the creation, and thereafter explosion, in popularity of the gold ETF, GLD has made is very easy and cost effective for major institutions to BUY $50, $500 million or even a billion dollars worth of gold with the click of a button.  This also means that when these institutions find a better trade they could SELL it just as easily.  There’s no need for armored trucks, or hard bargain negotiations.

The simplicity and low cost of ownership is why the value of gold increased with precise symmetry to the increased capital invested in the GLD fund, and others like it.  Small investors buying 10′s of thousands or even 100′s of thousands of dollars worth of the shiny metal simply don’t equate to the majority of the market, which is why they remain the vulnerable investors that are either the beneficiaries of the rising tide, or simply the collateral damage of the crash.

Gold Rises Symmetrically With AUM of GLD

Gold Rises Symmetrically With AUM of GLD

GOLD RISE AS A RESULT OF RISE IN ETF ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT

 

What will the Gold Crash Look Like?

Again, although I don’t know [yet] if now is the time of the crash, I do believe that if the violent downward price move we saw on Friday April 12, and overnight on the 14th continues into the 15th and 16th, then this is it, the crash is here.  If there’s a recovery, expect it to be short lived and just an opportunity to bail out.  At the bare minimum, investors should expect the price of gold to start a new volatility trend of 3%-6% per day moving forward, as the new normal.

Whether this is the crash or not is irrelevant, since neither crash is going to be pretty.  When the crash takes place, I believe gold will drop precipitously by as much as 40 to 60 percent inside of 30 days.  One bad day will lead to another horrible day as commodities firms and exchanges will increase margin requirements rapidly, which itself will speed up the crash by creating bigger margin call selling that just won’t stop until nearly no margin is used by small investors, and very little by large ones.  Think Financial markets of 2008, or better yet, the crash of oil (aka Black Gold”) shortly after hitting an all time high just a few years ago.

oil crash of 2008 shortly after hitting an all time high

oil crash of 2008 shortly after hitting an all time high

For the fundamental reasons of why I believe gold will inevitably crash now or soon, please read both of my articles.  At the very least  they are full of information I believe you will find useful whether you are a gold bull or bear.  The facts have not changed, so the articles have remained unedited.

Remember this is just my opinions for whatever it’s worth to you.  Our fund has derivative contracts that stand to benefit if gold declines.  My opinion is not going to change whether gold rises or declines.  Any investment decision you make should be made based on facts you have at hand and with as limited emotion as possible, and guidance from people you trust have your best interest in mind.  I hope individual investors somehow find a way to win in this situation.  I truly wish the Best of luck to you all.

Ron Reuven

 

 

As I predicted in PART I of my article, “Is Gold Useless?” more than a few “gold investors” were upset with me for raining on their parade.
Gold is a tangible asset…  

Gold has consistently beaten the stock market over the last 10 years… 

Just wait 2 years, you’ll see!

We’ve heard it all.

As silly as some of these may sound, they are some of the responses I’ve gotten from gold investors and professionals alike who really should know better.  (Of course there were many that agreed with me, but that’s not as much fun to discuss)  Emotional reactions like these create some of the biggest opportunities for gains and disasters in the global markets today.  These emotions are what make the “human element” the most valuable asset the global markets still have.  More often than any other factor, markets move based on the consensus and confidence (or lack thereof), rather than factual, fundamental results.  Projections, Predictions, Estimates, and Forecasts have all become pertinent parts of the Wall Street vocabulary.

 

Getting back to why I decided to write a part II on this topic, I must first admit that I received some of my new information from a recent visit to the New York Federal Reserve Bank. Conveniently located only a few blocks from my office, the Federal Reserve Bank holds more gold than Fort Knox or any other location in the world (approximately $170 Billion).   About 4% of these gold bars are owned by the U.S. government, while the rest is the property of nearly 60 different countries.  The U.S. Government’s gold is spread out amongst 11 other locations, with Fort Knox being its largest custodian.

I mention my recent trip to the Fed Bank for several reasons.   First, it’s to confirm that what I discussed in PART I of this article–the elimination of the Gold Standard–is a fact that the representatives at the Fed confirmed and is not just some “theory” I came up with for some self-serving purpose. I have nothing to gain from these truths, other than to inform and re-educate any curious parties.  The second reason, although slightly scarier, is to further explain why having a gold standard in the first place is no longer possible at this point, even if we wanted it.

According to the Fed, there is approximately $170 Billion worth of gold being custodies [free of charge] at the New York building for nearly 60 different countries.  Each compartment is identified by a unique numerical value, rather than the name of the country, in order to maintain the anonymity of its owners.  Although very rarely done, gold is moved from one compartment to another when countries trade with each other.  Our representatives said that they could only recall about 6 trades over the last decade, leading me to believe that this gold deposit is used more for show than the actual trade.  But I admit, that could just very well be my own skepticism.

The other interesting/scary fact that has been confirmed, was that the value of all of the gold that the U.S. government owns is only $190 Billion.  Taking that point further, the U.S. government has actually been a seller of its own gold in recent years.   To put this in perspective, most people that hear a number like $190 Billion immediately think of an astounding, infinite number that can never be broken.  Unfortunately, that thought process is only correct if you think about that number on a personal level.   “What would you do with $190 Billion?”  But, when you factor this number into the global markets, the U.S. GDP, or the amount of money that has been printed since the 2008 crises began, well, suddenly the picture doesn’t look quite the same. AIG single handedly received almost $200 Billion worth of Bailout Money, and even with that “infinite” wealth, they still can’t get it right.

It is not my position to imply that bailing out AIG was a mistake or not. But the question now is “Where is this money coming from?”  ANSWER—”The full faith and credit of the US government.”  Granted, if you ever had to base everything on someone’s guarantee, the US government is the best you can get.  But the point that gold investors MUST know is that there isn’t enough gold in the world to back up our own currency, let alone the entire worlds’.  There is no such thing as a Gold Standard anymore.  So if you are buying gold as an inflation protector, quite frankly you are investing with a blindfold over your eyes and plugs in your ears.

Yes, it’s true that gold may be a rare, tangible, and physical asset, but did you ever ask yourself, “why is it so valuable in the first place?”  For the most part, what can you possibly do with gold other than wear it?  Of course it has other uses, such as being a great conductor and medical element, but there isn’t enough of it to mass market it as a usable metal.  It is so rare that its replacements have become the standard.  In so many words, the fact that it is so rare is actually one of the reasons why I believe it not as valuable.This may contradict every supply & demand lesson we have ever learned, but what good is a product you can’t sell?To take this point further, why isn’t Copper more valuable?  It runs through almost every component of your house. It may be easier to find, but it’s still a “limited natural resource” that we will eventually run out of.  I know that this may sound preposterous at first, but if you really consider the facts without any biases, you would at the very least conclude why gold is worth nothing close to it’s current $1,000 an ounce price.  The fact that our own U.S. government is selling it off rapidly should at least indicate that their opinion is, well, not so different from mine.

So to conclude my gold analysis journey, I want to make sure that you understand that although many major gold owners fully comprehend everything that was discussed in both of these articles long before I brought them to your attention, they still chose to invest in the yellow metal because of the emotional value that has been emplaced in it since the beginning of time.  My concern is not about those types of investors, but rather the speculators that invested in it and helped the major owners sell their holdings at all- time high prices.  More speculative money has been invested in gold in recent years than any other time in history.  Despite the facts being discussed here, it doesn’t mean that gold won’t continue to trade at higher levels of 1100, 1200 or even 1500.  But like the oil bubble of 2008 or any other bubble that we so quickly choose to forget about, the inevitable POP is right around the corner.  You might not be able to see it, but you know it’s coming.  And while you and I may not know when, at least now we know why!  It is amazing what you can find out by just being a tourist in NYC.

These are the facts and a hell of a lot better than an opinion!

 

 

 

“This Blog is for the purpose of sharing of personal opinion and should not be construed in any way as advice. The information contained in this report or information provided does not purport to be complete description of the securities, markets or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. The contributors to this blog and or their affiliates may directly or indirectly have active positions in the securities that are mentioned. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. This information is not intended as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security referred to herein. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Ron Reuven is a registered principal of Reuven Enterprises Securities Division, Member FINRA/SIPC & Licensed MSRB Dealer, a fully owned subsidiary of Reuven Enterprises Inc. and is President & Managing Partner of Reuven Capital Investments, LP (long/short equity hedge fund).”

SunOpta: 2012 Recap And What’s The Next Catalyst

0 comments

 

RON REUVEN

In my recent SunOpta (STKL) thesis I outlined our bullish view of the relatively unknown $1.1 billion in annual sales Organic Food company, and how it compared to the likes of Hain Celestial (HAIN), Annie’s (BNNY) and other players in the organic food industry.  On March 5th, STKL announced company record results that have been relatively unnoticed.  Further, they also announced, a bit more subtly, that the next big catalyst for the stock has moved up in the timeline we projected.

To start off with earnings, here are the highlights from the SunOpta press release:

Fourth Quarter 2012 Highlights:

  • Record revenues of $270.1 million, an increase of approximately 12% versus 2011
  • Operating income of $7.2 million, an increase of 46% versus 2011
  • Record fourth quarter earnings of $4.4 million versus a loss of $7.6 million in 2011
  • Earnings per diluted common share of $0.07 versus a loss of $0.11 in 2011
  • EBITDA of $12.4 million ($0.19 per share), a 33% increase versus Q4 2011

Fiscal 2012 Highlights:

  • Record revenues of $1.091 billion, an increase of approximately 7% versus 2011
  • Operating income of $47.0 million, an increase of 39% versus 2011
  • Record earnings of $24.2 million, an increase of 357% versus 2011
  • Earnings per diluted common share increased to a record $0.36 versus $0.08 in 2011
  • EBITDA of $67.2 million ($1.02 per share), a 30% increase versus 2011

SunOpta's Field To Table Business ModelNow that we know the past year, let’s look at the future management is predicting.  With 2012 operating margins at 4.3% of sales, SunOpta is expecting margins to increase to 8% of sales, a staggering 86% increase.  This means that even if sales stay exactly the same (contrary to projections), operating income should increase to about $88 million.  With a current market cap of $446 million, this would peg the stock at 5x operating income, a steep discount to competitors like HAIN at 14.5x 2013 estimates, and BNNY at a staggering 29x fiscal 2012 estimates.

SunOpta’s projections for EBITDA margin, on the other hand, are to increase it from 6.2% in 2012 to 10%, a significant 61.3% increase.  This would peg EBITDA at $109 million, without assuming any additional revenue growth.  This would be a bit over half the EBITDA generated by HAIN ($205.9mm), which sports a $2.85 billion market cap, approximately 6.5x STKL’s market cap.  Again, HAIN and BNNY sport much higher multiples than STKL, with each trading at 13.9x, 26.8x EBITDA, respectively, compared to STKL’s minimal 6.6x 2012 EBITDA, and even much lower considering growth anticipated in 2013.

The good news is that SunOpta did grow their revenues by 12% in the 4th quarter—which was actually higher than HAIN’s 8.2% sales growth, and not much lower than much smaller comp BNNY—and is projecting double digit revenue growth in 2013 and the foreseeable future.

SunOpta’s balance sheet remained strong, with shareholder equity continuing its steady increase to $326.2 million, and a net book value of $4.94 per outstanding share.  Note that this book value is mainly comprised of the core organic food business and does not include the true hidden value STKL has from its ownership of Opta Minerals (OPM:TSX) and Mascoma, which we estimate to be worth as much as an additional $4 to $6 per share for those two holdings.  More on that is shown in the full thesis.  With this much in assets, current investors are getting the earnings power of STKL for free, since the true assets are worth more than current stock price.

The Next Big Catalyst Is Coming Sooner Than Expected

Although this was not discussed in the earnings press release, SunOpta’s management has been notoriously open about their future plans and very shareholder friendly.  This is why when asked about the timing (referring to 2013) and status (if they’ll grow it further or sell now) of the divestment of OPM during the conference call (by yours truly), SunOpta’s C.E.O, Steve Bromely, had no hesitation in stating that the OPM divestment is projected to happen in the immidiate future of 2013, rather than 2014 like we expected.  Below is the excerpt of the Q & A transcript (bold by me for emphasis).  For the entire conference call transcript click here.

Q: Ron Reuven (Analyst, Reuven Capital Investments)

Okay. And as far as, back, I guess, to Opta Minerals, I know you mentioned briefly that you’re looking to divest the company, possibly even do something in 2013. Do you see the company at this point growing these acquisitions at almost 50%? Do you see it as big enough to sell at this point? Or do you potentially see other acquisitions in the pipeline to grow the business a little further before putting it out in the market again?

A: Steven R. Bromley (Chief Executive Officer & Non-Independent Director, SunOpta, Inc.)

Well, Ron, I think it’s a very marketable asset. It’s a very well run business with a good management team and good systems and, I’m on the board, so it’s a great board. And it’s a really nice size business. And they’ve grown very nicely. They have a number of growth projects that they’re continuing to – internal growth projects. They’ve really got a decent platform there. I’m sure there’s other acquisitions that are out there. I can assure you that they’re not focused on any of that and they’re focused on integrating and getting the value from what they’ve purchased and everything and that’s what we’re encouraging them to do. So it was – it’s a – I believe and time will tell here, but I believe it’s a very saleable asset.

This is a big deal and major near term catalyst for SunOpta shareholders because it will not only be a cash windfall, but will also show investors exactly how much this asset is worth, since using the illiquid shares of OPM can be misleading for unknowledgeable investors .  This divestment will be a cash windfall for STKL shareholders as it will relieve $61 million out of $189 million (32%) of its debt—since its OPM’s non recourse debt owed to STKL.

Although it’s increased in value by 24% since my December article, the current market cap of $57 million for OPM doesn’t really make much sense, since they bought two companies (Babco and WGI) for $33 million in 2012, and should have an EBITDA of over $20 million in 2013.  The best part of all of this is that we just received confirmation that the timeline for this catalyst has just been cut in half.   The valuation is not going to be theoretical for very much longer.

Even though the opportunity of owning OPM shares directly can be lucrative, I believe the larger opportunity is in STKL shares, since they own the majority (66%) of the company for a much lower valuation on their books than one would be paying for the stock at this point.  Lastly, owning STKL shares will also allow you to be a part owner of the biggest [and most undervalued] organic food player you’ve never heard of.  To see how we come up with a $29 to $31 full valuation of main business see full thesis.

Watch SunOpta Company Video to learn more about what they do, or check out their SunOpta_Investor_Presentation

“This Blog is for the purpose of sharing of personal opinion and should not be construed in any way as advice. The information contained in this report or information provided does not purport to be complete description of the securities, markets or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. The contributors to this blog and or their affiliates may directly or indirectly have active positions in the securities that are mentioned. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. This information is not intended as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security referred to herein. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Ron Reuven is a registered principal of Reuven Enterprises Securities Division, Member FINRA/SIPC & Licensed MSRB Dealer, a fully owned subsidiary of Reuven Enterprises Inc. and is President & Managing Partner of Reuven Capital Investments, LP (long/short equity hedge fund).”

Is Art A Viable Alternative Investment? by Chandra Cardinale

0 comments

Chandra Cardinale

I recently met with my Wall Street neighbor Bettina Werner, a well established Italian-American artist.  Bettina’s unique medium is salt, which she began exhibiting in the 1980′s, building a dedicated following throughout the years.

Like Werner’s artwork, a true artist’s work can come in all shapes and sizes.  Art is most certainly an asset in the broadest sense of the word, and considered by some as their most valuable possessions.  Its aesthetic, cultural or historical value can be limitless, and unlike any other asset, it’s beauty and reward can be timeless.

"In Perfect Purple State" (artwork created with textured colorized salt technique invented by Bettina Werner in the early 1980's) This piece was inspired by the Sonnet XXXVIII by Elizabeth Barret Browning "First Time He Kissed Me (The Gold Blessing)"

Some investors believe Art to be a financially lucrative asset that can exceed the performance of other alternative investments.  Of course, there is no certainty that this is the case since each piece of art is unique and with it has its own market.  As with any asset, investing in art requires careful consideration and expert advice. Investing in art will not necessarily provide immediate returns, and as with other investments, it is certainly not risk-free or right for every investor.  Most importantly, investors must consider that one of the most difficult parts of investing in art is that it is an illiquid investment.  Although prices fluctuate like any other asset, finding the right buyer is sometimes more important than being in the right market.

Before buying a piece of art, one must consider whether it is an investment they are after, or timeless beauty.  Although art can and should serve both purposes, the rationale behind the investment is a critical component in determining the risk and time horizon.

Some art investors prefer the very well known works, ergo the blue-chips of the art world.  An investor that can find the best works at discounted prices—usually an outcome of unpleasant events—can certainly do well over time.  As in the stock market, people feel a well known brand provides safety.  Since this is not always the case, many art investors prefer a diverse mix of artists.  One way many investors have made very successful art investments, has been by buying works of established yet undervalued artists.

Bettina Werner is just one example of the many artists that are very well established in different parts of the world, but not known as well as some of the “blue chip artists” both art collectors and admirers always think of when the topic is mentioned at parties.  With such a unique medium, Bettina has earned the name of “The Salt Queen” in the art world.  Since not everyone can afford to buy a Monet, Van Gogh, or even a Tracey Emin, it is worth checking out young or successful mid-career artists like Bettina Werner, for both investment and collection purposes.  Regardless of which artist’s work you prefer, or whether your art will be an investment or not, savvy investors always know that a lot of knowledge or expert help is a necessity for success.

"Salt More Precious Than Gold" by Bettina Werner

Online art galleries such as Saatchi Online are nice places to start your at-home research.  Utilizing an expert can help you avoid buying a fake or a stolen work of art.  If you plan to go it alone, it might be worth checking out The Art Loss register, which is a database on stolen art.  Please do yourself the service and do your homework.

To sum it up, art is indeed a viable alternative investment for those who carefully navigate the market.  One of the unique and fun things about investing in art is that you can enjoy your investment’s beauty, while you wait. As long as your art is properly maintained and insured, you are able to retain it until you are either in the market for a change or the piece has increased in value as hoped.  Most art investors enjoy their collection so much that research shows that they do not anticipate selling until the value increases by over 60 percent.  If the value does not increase or even decreases it is still a piece that they can appreciate and enjoy owning forever. This is why I always say that regardless of whether you’re an investor or collector, make sure you love it.

FOR INQUIRIES PLEASE CONTACT: Chandra@reuvencapital.com

“This Blog is for the purpose of sharing of personal opinion and should not be construed in any way as advice. The information contained in this report or information provided does not purport to be complete description of the securities, markets or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. The contributors to this blog and or their affiliates may directly or indirectly have active positions in the securities that are mentioned. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. This information is not intended as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security referred to herein. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Ron Reuven is a registered principal of Reuven Enterprises Securities Division, Member FINRA/SIPC & Licensed MSRB Dealer, a fully owned subsidiary of Reuven Enterprises Inc. and is President & Managing Partner of Reuven Capital Investments, LP (long/short equity hedge fund).”
← Previous Posts

Sign up to my free newsletter

Categories