Is Art A Viable Alternative Investment? by Chandra Cardinale

0 comments

Chandra Cardinale

I recently met with my Wall Street neighbor Bettina Werner, a well established Italian-American artist.  Bettina’s unique medium is salt, which she began exhibiting in the 1980′s, building a dedicated following throughout the years.

Like Werner’s artwork, a true artist’s work can come in all shapes and sizes.  Art is most certainly an asset in the broadest sense of the word, and considered by some as their most valuable possessions.  Its aesthetic, cultural or historical value can be limitless, and unlike any other asset, it’s beauty and reward can be timeless.

"In Perfect Purple State" (artwork created with textured colorized salt technique invented by Bettina Werner in the early 1980's) This piece was inspired by the Sonnet XXXVIII by Elizabeth Barret Browning "First Time He Kissed Me (The Gold Blessing)"

Some investors believe Art to be a financially lucrative asset that can exceed the performance of other alternative investments.  Of course, there is no certainty that this is the case since each piece of art is unique and with it has its own market.  As with any asset, investing in art requires careful consideration and expert advice. Investing in art will not necessarily provide immediate returns, and as with other investments, it is certainly not risk-free or right for every investor.  Most importantly, investors must consider that one of the most difficult parts of investing in art is that it is an illiquid investment.  Although prices fluctuate like any other asset, finding the right buyer is sometimes more important than being in the right market.

Before buying a piece of art, one must consider whether it is an investment they are after, or timeless beauty.  Although art can and should serve both purposes, the rationale behind the investment is a critical component in determining the risk and time horizon.

Some art investors prefer the very well known works, ergo the blue-chips of the art world.  An investor that can find the best works at discounted prices—usually an outcome of unpleasant events—can certainly do well over time.  As in the stock market, people feel a well known brand provides safety.  Since this is not always the case, many art investors prefer a diverse mix of artists.  One way many investors have made very successful art investments, has been by buying works of established yet undervalued artists.

Bettina Werner is just one example of the many artists that are very well established in different parts of the world, but not known as well as some of the “blue chip artists” both art collectors and admirers always think of when the topic is mentioned at parties.  With such a unique medium, Bettina has earned the name of “The Salt Queen” in the art world.  Since not everyone can afford to buy a Monet, Van Gogh, or even a Tracey Emin, it is worth checking out young or successful mid-career artists like Bettina Werner, for both investment and collection purposes.  Regardless of which artist’s work you prefer, or whether your art will be an investment or not, savvy investors always know that a lot of knowledge or expert help is a necessity for success.

"Salt More Precious Than Gold" by Bettina Werner

Online art galleries such as Saatchi Online are nice places to start your at-home research.  Utilizing an expert can help you avoid buying a fake or a stolen work of art.  If you plan to go it alone, it might be worth checking out The Art Loss register, which is a database on stolen art.  Please do yourself the service and do your homework.

To sum it up, art is indeed a viable alternative investment for those who carefully navigate the market.  One of the unique and fun things about investing in art is that you can enjoy your investment’s beauty, while you wait. As long as your art is properly maintained and insured, you are able to retain it until you are either in the market for a change or the piece has increased in value as hoped.  Most art investors enjoy their collection so much that research shows that they do not anticipate selling until the value increases by over 60 percent.  If the value does not increase or even decreases it is still a piece that they can appreciate and enjoy owning forever. This is why I always say that regardless of whether you’re an investor or collector, make sure you love it.

FOR INQUIRIES PLEASE CONTACT: Chandra@reuvencapital.com

“This Blog is for the purpose of sharing of personal opinion and should not be construed in any way as advice. The information contained in this report or information provided does not purport to be complete description of the securities, markets or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. The contributors to this blog and or their affiliates may directly or indirectly have active positions in the securities that are mentioned. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. This information is not intended as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security referred to herein. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Ron Reuven is the Chief Investment Officer of Reuven Capital Investments, LP (long/short equity hedge fund).”

The Fish Rots From The Head Down, And Arm Holdings Is Starting To Smell

1 comment

Take a look at my recent contribution on Seeking Alpha.

Earlier this year, I published our short argument about Arm Holdings (ARMH). With the recent headlines created by the lowered guidance and Deutsche Bank’s downgrade of ARMH, as well as the one-day 9% drop that followed, I thought it would be a good time to publish our more recent update. For those of you that have read the past article, you will notice that some of the facts remain the same, while many new ones have been added. (If you are an ARMH bull and hate my view, please make sure to leave a relevant comment before bashing my input with insults.)

Arm Holdings is a European Intellectual Property firm that designs low powered microprocessors that are used in the majority of the mobile devices around the world. ARMH is a fabless company, meaning it does not actually manufacture chips, but rather it licenses its technology to companies like Apple (AAPL), Qualcomm (QCOM), Nvidia (NVDA), Samsung (SSNLF.PK) and many others. Unlike other well-known semiconductors such as Intel (INTC) or AMD (AMD), ARMH’s two sources of revenue come from the Royalties and Licensing (R&L) fees it receives for each device that is using its low power chip technology. ARMH’s stock has had a major run over the last several years, and it has become another company priced to perfection… (CONTINUE READING)

“This Blog is for the purpose of sharing of personal opinion and should not be construed in any way as advice. The information contained in this report or information provided does not purport to be complete description of the securities, markets or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. The contributors to this blog and or their affiliates may directly or indirectly have active positions in the securities that are mentioned. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. This information is not intended as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security referred to herein. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Ron Reuven is the Chief Investment Officer of Reuven Capital Investments, LP (long/short equity hedge fund).”

Heads, I Win, Tails, You Lose

0 comments
Another article by economists Brian Wesbury and Robert Stein.

Up, down, sideways…it’s all bad, all the time.

Take oil, for example. Between September 2011 and March 2012, oil prices rose about 20%. This generated all kinds of “sky-is-falling” stories about consumers having less money to spend. But, recently, as oil prices headed south in May and June, do you think the negativity went away? Not! The Pouting Pundits of Pessimism said falling oil was a bad sign, signaling weak global demand. It’s all bad, all the time. The glass is always half empty.

How about interest rates? The Fed has been trying to hold down long-term interest rates to stimulate the economy and lots of economists agree.

But now that the 10-year Treasury yield is below 1.5%, many argue that the low rates signal economic problems and the US is the new Japan. They say: look out for long-term stagnation and a double-dip.

And there is another group of analysts who fret about rising rates. If rates go up it will hurt consumers, lead to less refinancing, and less business borrowing. Once again, it seems no matter how we look at it, there is always a pessimistic view that comes to the surface.

The same goes for consumer debt and saving. Until recently, we were told that the economy was too slow because consumers were deleveraging. By saving more and borrowing less, the economy was being held back.

But now with consumer debt rising and saving rates trending down, guess what…this is bad, too. We hear more about spendthrift Americans who are on the verge of creating another Panic of 2008. Either way, if consumer debt is rising or falling, we’re told it’s bad.

The latest version of this “heads I win, tails you lose,” economic logic is being told about housing foreclosures. Remember when a wave of foreclosures threatened to collapse the housing market all over again? Well, now a recent TV news story bemoaned the “lack” of foreclosed homes. This, according to the new analysis, is holding down home sales because there are fewer homes on the market.

Obviously, the economic glass is not completely full right now. Real GDP is up only 2.2% in the past year and job growth is one-fourth of what it has been in recent recoveries. But this “all bad, all the time” stuff is kinda ridiculous, don’t you think?

This information contains forward-looking statements about various economic trends and strategies. You are cautioned that such forward-looking statements are subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and actual results could be materially different. There are no guarantees associated with any forecast and the opinions stated here are subject to change at any time and are the opinion of the individual strategist. Data comes from the following sources: Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Federal Reserve Board, and Haver Analytics. Data is taken from sources generally believed to be reliable but no guarantee is given to its accuracy.

“This Blog is for the purpose of sharing of personal opinion and should not be construed in any way as advice. The information contained in this report or information provided does not purport to be complete description of the securities, markets or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. The contributors to this blog and or their affiliates may directly or indirectly have active positions in the securities that are mentioned. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. This information is not intended as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security referred to herein. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Ron Reuven is the Chief Investment Officer of Reuven Capital Investments, LP (long/short equity hedge fund).”
← Previous Posts

Sign up to my free newsletter

Categories